بررسی تاثیر نوجویی ذاتی بر رفتار نوآورانه مصرف کننده با نقش واسط نوجویی در زمینه خاص (مورد مطالعه: مصرف کنندگان محصولات هوشمند پوشیدنی )

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت منابع انسانی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

3 استاد تمام، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

10.35066/J040.2019.115

چکیده

یکی از سودآورترین راهکارها برای سازمان‌های رقابتی، ارایه محصولات نوآورانه در بازار و به دست آوردن مزیت رقابتی است. نوجویی مصرف کننده این تمایل را در فرد ایجاد می کند تا به سراغ محصولات متفاوت برود. رفتار نوآورانه این مصرف کنندگان سایرین را تحریک می کند که از آنها الگو برداری کنند و محصولات جدید را بخرند. لذا مصرف کنندگان نوجو و رفتار نوآورانه آنها نقش کلیدی در موفقیت محصولات و خدمات جدید دارد. تحقیق حاضر مطابق با دیدگاه سلسله مراتبی نوجویی مصرف کننده به بررسی اثر نوجویی ذاتی بر رفتار نوآورانه مصرف کننده با نقش واسط نوجویی به دامنه خاص پرداخته است. پژوهش حاضر تحلیلی- پیمایشی و از نمونه گیری در دسترس استفاده شده است. چون حجم جامعه مشخص نیست و اطلاعی از واریانس جامعه در دسترس نیست، بر اساس فرمول کوکران با ضریب اطمینان 95% و مقدار خطای قابل تحمل 0.07 حجم نمونه 390 نفر از مصرف کنندگان محصولات هوشمند پوشیدنی در شهر مشهد می باشد. برای جمع آوری داده های اولیه از ابزار پرسشنامه استفاده شده است. پس از جمع آوری داده ها، فرضیه های پژوهش با استفاده از مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری و از طریق نرم افزار آموس تجزیه وتحلیل شدند. نتایج پژوهش حاضر، دیدگاه سلسله مراتبی نوجویی مصرف کننده را مورد تایید قرار داده است، بویژه اینکه نوجویی شناختی و نوجویی به محصول دارای نوگرایی در زمینه خاص و همچنین نوجویی احساسی و نوجویی به اطلاعات دارای نوگرایی در زمینه خاص بهترین ترکیب ها برای پیش بینی رفتار نوآورانه مصرف کننده می باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Effect of Innate Innovativeness on Innovative Consumer Behavior through the mediating role of Domain Specific Innovativness (Case Study: The consumers of Smart Wearable Products)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mona Kardani Malekinezhad 1
  • Alireza Khorakian 2
  • fariborz rahimnia 3
1 PhD Candidate in Human Resource Management, Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran.
3 Professor, Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

One of the most lucrative strategies for competitive organizations is to put innovative products on the market and gain a competitive advantage. Consumer innovativeness creates the desire in a person to go for different products. The innovative behavior of these consumers motivates others to emulate them and buy new products. Therefore, innovative consumers and their innovative behavior play a key role in the success of new products and services. The present study, in accordance with the hierarchical view of consumer innovativeness, examines the effect of innate innovativeness on innovative consumer behavior with the role of the interface of domain specific innovativeness. The research method of the present study is analytical-survey and in this research, available sampling has been used. Because the size of the community is not known and no information is available on the variance of the community, according to the Cochran's formula with a 95% confidence interval and a tolerable error value of 0.07, the sample size is 390 consumers of smart wearable products in Mashhad. A questionnaire was used to collect preliminary data. After collecting the data, the research hypotheses were analyzed using structural equation modeling and through Amos software. The results of the present study confirm the hierarchical view of consumer innovativess, especially that cognitive innovatiness and Product possessing innovativeness as well as Sensory innovativeness and Information possessing innovativeness are the best combinations to predict innovative consumer behavior.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Innovative consumer behavior
  • Domain specific innovativeness
  • Innate innovativeness
ترابی، فاطمه؛ رحیمی‌نیک، اعظم؛ اسماعیل‌پور، حسن و ودادی، احمد (1398). تبیین مدل رفتار خرید مصرف‌کننده در انتخاب محصولات لذت‌بخش با رویکرد آمیخته (مورد مطالعه: فروشگاه‌های زنجیره‌ای همواره تخفیف). مطالعات رفتار مصرف‌کننده، 6 (1)، 81-103.‎
خدادادحسینی، سیدحمید؛ سمیعی، نیلوفر و احمدی، پرویز (1397). تأثیر بازاریابی رسانه‌های اجتماعی بر رفتار مصرف‌کنندگان؛ بررسی نقش ارزش ویژه برند، کیفیت رابطه برند و نگرش نسبت به برند. مطالعات رفتار مصرف‌کننده، 5 (1)، 37-59.‎
References
Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research64(6), 601-609.‏
Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1996). Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement. International journal of Research in marketing13(2), 121-137.‏
Belch, G.E., & Belch, M.A. (2012). Advertising and Promotion: An         Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. McGraw- Hill Irwin, New York.
Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. ACR North American Advances.‏11, 291–297.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of personality and social psychology42(1), 116.‏
Chao, C. W., Reid, M., & Mavondo, F. (2013). Global consumer innovativeness and consumer electronic product adoption. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.‏ 25 (4), 614– 663.
Chao, C. W., Reid, M., & Mavondo, F. T. (2012). Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)20(3), 211-217.‏
Cheung, M. L., Chau, K. Y., Lam, M. H. S., Tse, G., Ho, K. Y., Flint, S. W., ... & Lee, K. Y. (2020). Examining consumers’ adoption of wearable healthcare technology: The role of health attributes. International journal of environmental research and public health16(13), 2257.‏
Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior63, 777-786.‏
Christia, J. (2014). The Effect of Alliance Image on the Relationship      between Consumer Innovativeness and New Product Adoption    .Int. J.Technology Marketing. 125 (5), 765-778.
Citrin, A. V., Sprott, D. E., Silverman, S. N., & Stem, D. E. (2000). Adoption of Internet shopping: the role of consumer innovativeness. Industrial management & data systems.‏100        (7), 294-300.
Cotte, J., & Wood, S. L. (2004). Families and innovative consumer behavior: A triadic analysis of sibling and parental influence. Journal of consumer research31(1), 78-86.‏
Foxall, G. R. (1995). Cognitive styles of consumer initiators. Technovation15(5), 269-288.‏
Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the academy of marketing science19(3), 209-221.‏
Goldsmith, R. E., Freiden, J. B., & Eastman, J. K. (1995). The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research. Technovation15(10), 601-612.‏
Goldsmith, R. E., Kim, D., Flynn, L. R., & Kim, W. M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. The Journal of social psychology145(5), 501-508.‏
Hartman, J. B., Gehrt, K. C., & Watchravesringkan, K. (2004). Re-examination of the concept of innovativeness in the context of the adolescent segment: Development of a measurement scale. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing12(4), 353-365.‏
Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006). Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing science25(6), 687-717.‏
Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Why innovations fail—The case of passive and active innovation resistance. International Journal of Innovation Management17(05), 1350021.‏
Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of consumer research7(3), 283-295.‏
Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of consumer marketing. 23 (4), 182-198.
Hoffmann, S., & Soyez, K. (2010). A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness. Journal of Business Research63(7), 778-785.‏
Hong, J. C., Lin, P. H., & Hsieh, P. C. (2017). The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior67, 264-272.‏
Im, S., Bayus, B. L., & Mason, C. H. (2003). An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. Journal of the academy of marketing science31(1), 61-73.‏
Im, S., Mason, C. H., & Houston, M. B. (2007). Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? The intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science35(1), 63-75.‏
Jaiyeoba, O. O., & Opeda, F. O. (2013). Impact of consumer innovativeness on shopping styles: A case-study of limkokwing university students (Botswana). Business and Management Horizons1(2), 107-117.‏
Jeong, S. C., Kim, S. H., Park, J. Y., & Choi, B. (2017). Domain-specific innovativeness and new product adoption: A case of wearable devices. Telematics and Informatics34(5), 399-412.‏
Kaushik, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2014). Perspectives and dimensions of consumer innovativeness: A literature review and future agenda. Journal of International Consumer Marketing26(3), 239-263.‏
Khodadad Hosseini, H., Samiei, N., & Ahmadi, P. (2018). The Effect of Social Media Marketing on Consumer Behavior; Investigating the Role of Brand Equity, Brand Relationship Quality and Attitude towards Brand. Consumer Behavior Studies Journal5(1), 37-59.‏ (in Persian)
Lee, K., & Mano, H. (2014). Beyond simple innovativeness: A hierarchical continuum and thinking and feeling processing modes. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal42(4), 597-613.‏
Lim, H., & Park, J. S. (2013). The effects of national culture and cosmopolitanism on consumers’ adoption of innovation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of International Consumer Marketing25(1), 16-28.‏
Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of consumer research4(4), 229-242.‏
Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1993). A longitudinal study of product form innovation: the interaction between predispositions and social messages. Journal of consumer research19(4), 611-625.‏
Nasution, R. A., & Astuti, N. C. (2013). Consumer Innovativeness Model of Indonesian Young People in Adopting Electronic Products. ASEAN Marketing Journal.‏ 4(1), 1-12.
Park, J. E., Yu, J., & Zhou, J. X. (2010). Consumer innovativeness and shopping styles. Journal of Consumer Marketing.‏ 27 (5), 437-   446.
Pearson, P. H. (1970). Relationships between global and specified measures of novelty seeking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology34(2), 199.‏
Robertson, T. S., & Myers, J. H. (1969). Personality correlates of opinion leadership and innovative buying behavior. Journal of Marketing Research6(2), 164-168.‏
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free      Press
Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Gielens, K. (2003). Consumer and market drivers of the trial probability of new consumer packaged goods. Journal of Consumer Research30(3), 368-384.‏
Summers, J. O. (1972). Media exposure patterns of consumer innovators. Journal of Marketing36(1), 43-49.‏
Torabi, F., Rahiminik, A., Esmaeilpour, H., & Vedadi, A. (2019). Designing and explaining a consumer behavior model in choosing Hedonic Products: Mixed approach (Case study: Discount chain stores). Consumer Behavior Studies Journal6(1), 81-103.‏ (in Persian)
Venkatraman, M. P., & Price, L. L. (1990). Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: Concepts, measurement, and implications. Journal of Business research20(4), 293-315.‏
Wang, E. S. T. (2015). The role of player innovativeness in adopting new online games: bidimensional and hierarchical perspectives. International Journal of Technology Marketing10(3), 236-247.‏
Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1981). Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation. Basic and applied social psychology2(2), 89-114.‏
Wood, S. L., & Swait, J. (2002). Psychological indicators of innovation adoption: Cross-classification based on need for cognition and need for change. Journal of Consumer Psychology12(1), 1-13.‏
Zarandi, H. N., & Lotfizadeh, F. (2016). The Influence of Cognitive Innovativeness on the Behavior and Style of Consumer Adoption: Implications for Electronic-Banking Service Adoption. International Journal of Marketing Studies8(5), 90-103.‏
Zarandi, H. N., & Lotfizadeh, F. (2016). The Influence of Cognitive Innovativeness on the Behavior and Style of Consumer Adoption: Implications for Electronic-Banking Service Adoption. International Journal of Marketing Studies8(5), 90-103.‏
Zhang, F., Sun, S., Liu, C., & Chang, V. (2020). Consumer innovativeness, product innovation and smart toys. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications41, 100974.‏