بررسی تجربه دیجیتالی کاربران بانکداری اینترنتی با استفاده از روش هیوریستیک

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، ‌مدیریت بازرگانی، ‌گروه مدیریت، ‌دانشکدة مدیریت، ‌دانشگاه آزاد تهران شمال‌

2 استادیاربازاریابی، ‌گروه مدیریت، ‌دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران

3 استادیار، ‌بازاریابی، ‌گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، ‌دانشکده مدیریت، ‌دانشگاه آزاد تهران شمال

4 استادیار، ‌منابع انسانی، ‌گروه مدیریت، ‌دانشکده مدیریت، ‌دانشگاه تهران،

چکیده

گسترش نفوذ بانکداری اینترنتی در کشور، تجربه‏ ی کاربری بانکداری اینترنتی را به یک عامل کلیدی جهت برتری در فضای رقابتی کنونی تبدیل کرده است. از این‏رو ارزیابی تجربه‏ ی کاربری گامی کلیدی در جلب رضایت و وفاداری مشتریان به شمار می رود.
روش تحقیق در این مطالعه، توصیفی است. برای ارزیابی تجربه‏ ی کاربری روش‏های متعددی ارایه شده است که در این میان روش هیوریستیک (روش کیفی) یکی از گسترده‏ ترین روش‏های ارزیابی تجربه‏ ی کاربری سیستم‏های تعاملی به شمار می‏ رود. این رویکرد یک روش اثربخش برای ارزیابی رابط کاربری مبتنی بر اصل طراحی کاربرمحور به شمار می‏ رود. این مقاله تجربه‏ ی کاربری را روی وب سایت‏های بانک‏های تجاری ملت، ملی و سامان را به عنوان یک مطالعه موردی، با اصول ده گانه کاربردپذیری نیلسن (1994)مورد بررسی قرار می‏ دهد.
یافته‏ ها نشان می دهد که تفاوت‏هایی بین طراحی وب سایت‏های بانک‏ها؛ شامل برخی مشکلات مانند عدم اطلاع از زمان انتظار کاربر و عدم وجود قرارگیری مکان اطلاعات بصورت منطقی وجود دارد. در بین سه وب‏سایت بانکی که ارزیابی شد، بانک A کاربردپذیر‏تر از دو بانک دیگر شناخته شد و دلیل آن سادگی و عدم وجود اطلاعات غیر ضروری در سیستم بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Digital Experience of Internet Banking Users Using the Heuristic Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • banafsheh seyyedkobari 1
  • Masoud Keimasi 2
  • Ehsan Abedi 3
  • Rosa Hendijani 4
1 Department of Business Management, Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant prof. in Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Business Management, Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Human Resources, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The expanding influence of Internet banking in the country has made the experience of Internet banking a key factor for excellence in the current competitive environment. Therefore, evaluating the user experience is a key step in gaining customer satisfaction and loyalty. In the research method for evaluating user experience, several methods are presented, among which the hysterical (qualitative) method is one of the most widely used methods for evaluating the user experience of interactive systems. This approach is an effective way to evaluate the user interface based on the principle of user-centered design. This article examines user experience on Mellat, Melli and Saman commercial bank websites as a case study with ten usability principles. According to the findings of this study, there is a significant difference between the designs of banks' websites, including some problems, such as lack of information about the user's waiting time, lack of logical location of information. Based on the results of the research among the three websites of the Bank, evaluated Bank A, because of its simplicity and the lack of unnecessary information in the system, is more user-friendly than the other two banks.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • User experience
  • usability
  • heuristics
  • website usability
  • Design
  • Alotaibi, M. B. (2016). Comparing the usability of m-business and m-government software in Saudi Arabia. A revise of Nielsen's heuristics method. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7 (1), 1-7.
  • Black, J. (2002). Usability is next to profitability. Business Week Online. http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2002-12-03/usability-is-next-to-profitability.
  • Bogan, C, E., & English, M. J. (1994). Benchmarking for best practices: Winning through innovative adap-tation. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Bogetoft, P. (2012). Performance benchmarking measuring and managing performance. New York: Springer.
  • Campos, A., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Sanz, F., Gálvez, R., & Quiñones, D. (2016). Usability heuristics and design recommendations for driving simulators. In Information Technology: New Generations (pp. 1287-1290). Springer, Cham.
  • Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C. and Guinalíu, M. (2010) 'Generating trust and satisfaction in e-services: the impact of usability on consumer behavior', Journal of Relationship Marketing, 9 (4), pp. 247-263.
  • Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2005). The assessment of usability of electronic shopping: a heuristic evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, 25, 516-532.
  • Delice, E. K., & Güngör, Z. (2009). The usability analysis with heuristic evaluation and ana-lytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 934-939
  • Díaz, J., Rusu, C., Pow-Sang, J. A., & Roncagliolo, S. (2013, November). A cultural-oriented usability heuristics proposal. In Proceedings of the 2013 Chilean Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 82-87). ACM.
  • Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and software Technology, 53 (8), 789-817.
  • Gale, N., Mirza-Babaei, P., & Pedersen, I. (2015, October). Heuristic guidelines for playful wearable augmented reality applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 529-534). ACM
  • Greiner, L. (2007). Usability 101. Networker, 11 (2), 11-13
  • Han, S.H., Yun, M.H., Kwahk, J. and Hong, S.W. (2001) 'Usability of consumer electronic products', International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28 (3), pp. 143-151
  • Hermawati, S., & Lawson, G. (2015, April). A user-centric methodology to establish usability heuristics for specific domains. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors (pp. 80-85).
  • Hermawati, S., & Lawson, G. (2016). Establishing usability heuristics for heuristics evaluation in a specific domain: Is there a consensus?. Applied ergonomics, 56, 34-51.
  • ISO 9241-11. (1998). Guidelines for specifying and measuring usability.
  • ISO DIS 9241-210:2010. Ergonomics of human system interaction -Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). International Standardization Organization (ISO). Switzerland
  • ISO/IEC. (1991). ISO 9126. Information technology-Software quality characteristics and metrics. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: AP Professional.
  • Jaferian, P., Hawkey, K., Sotirakopoulos, A., Velez-Rojos, M., & Beznosov, K. (2014). Heu-ristics for evaluating IT security management tools. Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 311-350.
  • Jaime Díaz,Cristian Rusu,César A. Collazos (2016)Experimental Validation of a Set of Cultural-Oriented Usability Heuristics: e-Commerce Websites Evaluation
  • Jeffries, R., & Desurvire, H. (1992). Usability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: Was there a contest: ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24 (4), 39-41.
  • Ji, Y. G., Park, J. H., Lee, C., & Yun, M. H. (2006). A usability checklist for the usability evaluation of mo-bile phone user interface. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 20 (3), 207-231.
  • Juristo et al.; Gonzalez et al, (2014) A systematic mapping study on testing technique experiments: has the situation changed since 2000
  • Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M. and Sanchez-Segura, M. (2007) 'Analysing the impact of usability on software design', Journal of Systems and Software, 80 (9), pp. 1506-1516.
  • Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M. and Sanchez-Segura, M. (2007) 'Guidelines for eliciting usability functionalities', Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 33 (11), pp. 744-758.
  • Law, E.L., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P. and Kort, J. (2009) 'Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach', Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 719-728
  • Lechner, B., Fruhling, A., Petter, S., & Siy, H. (2013). The chicken and the pig: User involvement in developing usability heuristics.
  • Madan, A. and Dubey, S.K. (2012) 'Usability evaluation methods: a literature review', International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4 (2), pp. 590-599
  • Mayhew, D. J. (2005). Cost-justifying usability: An update for internet age, http://www.globalspec.com/reference/42279/203279/chapter-2-user-interface-design-s-return-on-investment-examples-and-statistics
  • Muller, M., Matheson, L., Page, C., Gallup, R. (1998). Methods and tools,: Participatory heuristic evaluation, Interaction, 5, 13-18.
  • Nielsen, J. & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Con-ference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 249-256). New York: ACM.
  • Nielsen, J. (1993) 'Iterative user-interface design', Computer, 26 (11), pp. 3https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1428342-41.
  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of CHI-94 conference (pp. 152-158).
  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Elsevier.
  • Nielsen, J. and Molich,R. (1990) 'Heuristic evaluation and user interface', ACM, pp. 249-256
  • Paddison, C., & Englefield, P. (2003). Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability (pp. 126-133). New York: ACM Press.
  • Pierotti, D. (1995). Usability analysis & design. Xerox Corporation. https://web.fe.up.pt/~ei08119/wiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=heuristic_evaluation_-_system_checklist.pdf.
  • Quiñones, D., & Rusu, C. (2017). How to develop usability heuristics: A systematic literature review. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 53, 89-122.
  • Quiñones, D., Rusu, C., & Rusu, V. (2018). A methodology to develop usability/user experience heuristics. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 59, 109-129.
  • Reese hoi tin fung,Dickson k.w.chiu.Eddi h.t.ko (2016) Heuristic usability evaluation of university of hong kong libraries
  • Rocha, L. C., Andrade, R. M., Sampaio, A. L., & Lelli, V. (2017, July). Heuristics to evaluate the usability of ubiquitous systems. In International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions (pp. 120-141). Springer, Cham.
  • Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Tapia, G., Hayvar, D., Rusu, V., & Gorgan, D. (2011, February). Usability heuristics for grid computing applications. In Proceedings of The 4th International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions ACHI.
  • Salazar, L., H., Lacerda, T., Nunes, J.V., & von Wangenheim, C. G. (2013). A systematic literature review on usability heuristics for mobile phones. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), 5 (2), 50-61.
  • Scholtz, J. (2004) 'Usability evaluation', National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Seffah, A., & Metzker, E. (2004). The obstacles and myths of usability and software engineering. Communications of the ACM, 47 (12), 71-76.
  • Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the user interface strategies for effective human-computer interaction (5th ed.). Addison-Wesley
  • Sim, G., Read, J. C., & Cockton, G. (2009, August). Evidence based design of heuristics for computer assisted assessment. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 204-216). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Singh, A., & Wesson, J. (2009). Evaluation criteria for assessing the usability of ERP sys-tems. In SAICSIT, 12-14 october, riverside, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
  • Vermeen ,Effie lai,Virpi Roto (2010)user experience Evalution methods.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221248254_User_experience_evaluation_methods_Current_state_and_development_needs
  • Yeratziotis, A., Pottas, D., & Van Greunen, D. (2012). A usable security heuristic evaluation for the online health social networking paradigm. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28, 678-694.