مطالعه‎ مردم‎ نگارانه درک معنای برند ترک (مطالعه موردی منطقه آزاد انزلی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران

10.34785/J018.2019.768

چکیده

اقبال مصرف‎کنندگان ایرانی به محصولات ساخت ترکیه به‎گونه‎ای است که بسیاری‎از تولیدکنندگان ایرانی محصولات خود را ساخت ترکیه و بسیاری‎از فروشندگان ایرانی محصولات ساخت ایران را جنس ترک معرفی می‎کنند. در این شرایط تولیدکنندگان ایرانی صدای خاموش صحنه‎ی بازار هستند. هدف از پژوهش حاضر درک معنای تولیدکنندگان ایرانی از برند جنس ترک است که برای این منظور از روش پژوهش مردم‎نگاری با رویکرد انتقادی استفاده شد. جامعه‎ی آماری پژوهش تولیدکنندگان در منطقه آزاد انزلی، روش نمونه‎گیری غیراحتمالی هدفمند و حجم نمونه باز با قید دستیابی به اجماع نظری است. مصاحبه نیمه‎ساختاریافته، مشاهده غیرمستقیم و مستقیم، حضور در کنش‎های فردی و جمعی و یادداشت‎برداری راه‎های جمع‎آوری داده‎های مورد نیاز پژوهش است. استفاده‎از استقراء در بررسی داده‎های جمع‎آوری شده در فرآیند مشاهده، مصاحبه، یادداشت‎برداری، استخراج گزاره، کدگذاری باز، کشف مفهوم و کدگذاری محوری نشان‎داد که معنای تولیدکنندگان ایرانی از جنس ترک دارای سه مقوله‎ی پشتیبانی دولت ملّی‎گرای جمهوری ترکیه از برندهای با مبدأ ترکیه، پشتیبانی مردم ملّی‎گرای جمهوری ترکیه از برندهای با مبدأ ترکیه و فضای مناسب کسب‎وکار در جمهوری ترکیه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An ethnographic study of understanding the meaning of Turk brand (Case study of Anzali Free Zone)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Saleh Torkestani 1
  • Pedram Jahedi 2
1 Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
2 Faculty of management and accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University
چکیده [English]

Iranian consumers tend to make Turkish products in such a way that many Iranian manufacturers introduce Turkish products and many Iranian sellers describe Iranian products as Turkish. Under these circumstances, Iranian producers are the silent voice of the market. The purpose of the present study is to understand the meaning of the Turkish producers of the Turkish brand using a critical approach to ethnographic research. The statistical population of the study is producers in Anzali Free Zone, the non-probability sampling method is targeted and the sample size is open to achieving theoretical consensus. Semi-structured interviews, indirect and direct observation, participation in individual and collective actions and taking notes were used to collect the required data. The use of induction to examine data collected in the process of observation, interviewing, taking notes, proposing extraction, open coding, concept discovery and axial coding showed that the meaning of Iranian producers of Turkish origin has three categories including turkey’s nationalist government backs brands of Turkish origin, supporting Turkish nationalist brands of Turkish origin and the right place for business is in Turkey.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ethnography
  • Critical Ethnography
  • Country of origin
  • Turk brand
  • Anzali Free Zone
  • Anderson, G. L. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of educational research59 (3), 249-270.
  • Ang, I. (2018). Ethnography and radical contextualism in audience studies. In The audience and its landscape (pp. 247-262). Routledge.
  • Anholt, S. (2005). Some important distinctions in place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 1 (2), 116-121.
  • Bechhofer, F., & McCrone, D. (2009). National identity, nationalism and constitutional change. In National Identity, Nationalism and Constitutional Change (pp. 1-16). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Beiser, F. C. (2017). The Context and Problematic of Post‐Kantian Philosophy. A companion to continental philosophy, 19-34.
  • Bidabadi, F. S., Yazdannik, A., & Zargham-Boroujeni, A. (2017). Patient’s dignity in intensive care unit: A critical ethnography. Nursing ethics, 0969733017720826.
  • Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary economics34 (2), 143-173.
  • Blaisdell, B. (2016). Exorcising the Racism Phantasm: Racial Realism in Educational Research. The Urban Review48 (2), 285-310.
  • Cañas, A. J., Reiska, P., & Möllits, A. (2017). Developing higher-order thinking skills with concept mapping: A case of pedagogic frailty. Knowledge Management & E-Learning9 (3), 348.
  • Canivez, P. (2018). The dialectic of recognition: A post-Hegelian approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 1368431018787412.
  • Casile, M., & Davis-Blake, A. (2002). When accreditation standards change: Factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 180-195.
  • Cayla, J., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2007). Asian brands without borders: regional opportunities and challenges. International Marketing Review24 (4), 444-456.
  • Chaparani, E., Fard Sabouri, M. (2011). comparison of domestic and foreign brands power from the Guilan province customers' point of view in home appliances products. Business Management, 3 (8), 41-60. [Persian].
  • Ciravegna, L., Lopez, L., & Kundu, S. (2014). Country of origin and network effects on internationalization: A comparative study of SMEs from an emerging and developed economy. Journal of Business Research67 (5), 916-923.
  • Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science62 (4), 936-953.
  • Creanza, N., Kolodny, O., & Feldman, M. W. (2017). Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114 (30), 7782-7789.
  • Cruz, E. V., & Higginbottom, G. (2013). The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse researcher20 (4).
  • Darnall, N. (2008). Creating a green brand for competitive distinction. Asian Business & Management7 (4), 445-466.
  • Davis, J. (2017). Disabled children, ethnography and unspoken understandings: The collaborative construction of diverse identities. In Research with Children (pp. 133-153). Routledge.
  • Davison, C., Frankel, S., & Smith, G. D. (2018). ‘To hell with tomorrow’: coronary heart disease risk and the ethnography of fatalism. In Private risks and public dangers (pp. 95-111). Routledge.
  • De Chernatony, L., & Dall'Olmo Riley, F. (1998). Defining a" brand": Beyond the literature with experts' interpretations. Journal of Marketing Management14 (5), 417-443.
  • Decrop, A., & Derbaix, C. (2010). Pride in contemporary sport consumption: a marketing perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science38 (5), 586-603.
  • Diamantopoulos, A., Herz, M., & Koschate-Fischer, N. (2017). The EU as superordinate brand origin: an entitativity perspective. International Marketing Review34 (2), 183-205.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry12 (2), 219-245.
  • Foster, R. J. (2007). The work of the new economy: Consumers, brands, and value creation. Cultural Anthropology22 (4), 707-731.
  • Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European journal of Marketing39 (3/4), 294-308.
  • Hjørland, B. (1992). The concept of ‘subject’in information science. Journal of documentation48 (2), 172-200.
  • Hussein, A. S. (2017). Effects of Brand Experience on Brand Loyalty in Indonesian Casual Dining Restaurant: Roles of Customer Satisfaction and Brand of Origin. Tourism and hospitality management24 (1), 1-14.
  • Iman, M. T., Bazr Afkan, M. (2015). Understanding the meaning of corporate social responsibility among women in the Assaluyeh region. Woman in development and politics,13 (1), 1-22. [Persian].
  • Johnson, D. C. (2016). Critical ethnography of language policy: A semi-confessional tale. In Researching Multilingualism (pp. 119-134). Routledge.
  • Johnson, H. G. (1965). A theoretical model of economic nationalism in new and developing states. Political Science Quarterly80 (2), 169-185.
  • Johnson, J. S. (2015). Qualitative sales research: An exposition of grounded theory. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management35 (3), 262-273.
  • Kameli, A., Yazdani, H. Seyed Amir, N. (2016). The impact of the image of the country of origin and marketing efforts on the retail brand equity. Business Management Perspective, 14 (4), 79-96. [Persian].
  • Katz, C. (2018). The expeditions of conjurers: Ethnography, power, and pretense. In Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 170-184). Routledge.
  • Kawai, Y. (2007). Japanese nationalism and the global spread of English: An analysis of Japanese governmental and public discourses on English. Language and Intercultural Communication7 (1), 37-55.
  • Kelliher, F. (2011). Interpretivism and the pursuit of research legitimisation: an integrated approach to single case design. Leading issues in business research methods1 (2), 123-131.
  • Laging, B., Kenny, A., Bauer, M., & Nay, R. (2018). Recognition and assessment of resident’deterioration in the nursing home setting: A critical ethnography. Journal of clinical nursing27 (7-8), 1452-1463.
  • Lichterman, P. (2017). Interpretive reflexivity in ethnography. Ethnography18 (1), 35-45.
  • Liu, S. S., Johnson, K. F., & Johnson, K. F. (2005). The automatic country-of-origin effects on brand judgments. Journal of advertising34 (1), 87-97.
  • Loizides, N. G. (2009). Religious nationalism and adaptation in Southeast Europe. Nationalities Papers37 (2), 203-227.
  • Loureiro, M. L., & Umberger, W. J. (2005). Assessing consumer preferences for country-of-origin labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 37 (1), 49-63.
  • Martineau, P. (1958). Sharper focus for the corporate image. Harvard Business Review36 (6), 49-58.
  • McQuiston, D. H. (2004). Successful branding of a commodity product: The case of RAEX LASER steel. Industrial Marketing Management33 (4), 345-354.
  • Ntounis, N. F., Lloveras, J., & Parker, C. (2017). A Review Of Epistemological Issues And Philosophical Positons For The Development Of Theory In Place Marketng.
  • Packard, M. D. (2017). Where did interpretivism go in the theory of entrepreneurship?. Journal of Business Venturing32 (5), 536-549.
  • Palmer, A. (2001). Co-operation and collusion: making the distinction in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing Management17 (7-8), 761-784.
  • Papadakis, Y. (1998). Greek Cypriot narratives of history and collective identity: Nationalism as a contested process. American Ethnologist25 (2), 149-165.
  • Parker-Jenkins, M. (2018). Problematising ethnography and case study: reflections on using ethnographic techniques and researcher positioning. Ethnography and Education13 (1), 18-33.
  • Palmer, D., & Caldas, B. (2017). Critical ethnography. In Research Methods in Language and Education (pp. 381-392). Springer, Cham.
  • Ryan, G. (2018). Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. Nurse researcher25 (4), 14-20.
  • Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public administration review36 (2), 233-244.
  • Samy, M., & Robertson, F. (2017). 27. from positivism to social constructivism: an emerging trend for CSR researchers. Handbook of Research Methods in Corporate Social Responsibility, 437.
  • Simmons, W. P., & Feldman, L. R. (2018). Critical ethnography and human rights research. In Research Methods in Human Rights (pp. 122-141). Routledge.
  • Sawyer, M. E. (2018). Post-Truth, Social Media, and the “Real” as Phantasm. In Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society (pp. 55-69). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  • Thakor, M. V., & Lavack, A. M. (2003). Effect of perceived brand origin associations on consumer perceptions of quality. Journal of Product & Brand Management12 (6), 394-407.
  • Thompson, D. K., & Grant, R. (2015, September). Enclaves on edge: strategy and tactics in immigrant business spaces of Johannesburg. In Urban Forum (Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 243-262). Springer Netherlands.
  • Velásquez, J. R. C., Benedetti, A., & Gómez, D. A. (2017). Colombian consumers’ evaluation of foreign goods: The country of origin effect.
  • Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. C., & Singhapakdi, A. (1993). Marketing norms: The influence of personal moral philosophies and organizational ethical culture. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science21 (4), 331.
  • Wilson, S. (1977). The use of ethnographic techniques in educational research. Review of educational research47 (2), 245-265.
  • Wood, L. (2000). Brands and brand equity: definition and management. Management decision38 (9), 662-669.
  • World Bank (2019). Ease of doing business index. Washington: A group of writers.
  • Yavuz, M. H. (2018). A Framework for Understanding the Intra-Islamist Conflict Between the AK Party and the Gülen Movement. Politics, Religion & Ideology19 (1), 11-32.