The effect of buying motivations on customer stickiness with the mediating role of customer attachment and perceived value in cyberspace

Document Type : Quantitative Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department Of Business Administration Faculty of Management,Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department Of Business Administration Faculty of Management,Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

10.34785/J018.2022.290

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine the effect of buying motivations on customer stickiness with the mediating role of customer attachment and perceived value among customers of Digi Kala online store. In order to achieve the research goal and test the relevant hypotheses, a questionnaire among 200 customers of Digi Kala online store who have purchased online at least once from Digi Kala online store in cooperation with the online store customer relationship management Digikala was widely distributed through simple random sampling method. Library methods and field methods were used to collect information. Standard questionnaires were used to collect data online. The least squares partial (PLS) method was used to analyze the data and test the research hypotheses. After collecting data and analyzing them, the results showed: hedonistic motivation affects conscious attachment, desire and social interaction, on the other hand, utilitarian motivation affects conscious attachment and desire, but interaction Social has no effect. The results also showed that conscious attachment and desire affect functional, hedonistic and social values. On the other hand, social interaction affects only functional and hedonistic value and its effect on social value was not confirmed. Finally, it was found that functional, hedonic and social values ​​affect customer stickiness

Keywords

References

 
 
References
Aldieri, L., Sena, V., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). Domestic R&D spillovers and absorptive capacity: Some evidence for US, Europe and Japan. International Journal of Production Economics, 198, 38-49.
Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Li, D., & Sampat, B. N.(2019).Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: evidence from NIH funding rules. The Review of economic studies,86(1),117-152
Babkin, A., Lipatnikov, V., & Muraveva, S. (2015). Assessing the impact of innovation strategies and R&D costs on the performance of IT companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 749-758.
Castellani, D., Montresor, S., Schubert, T., & Vezzani, A. (2017). Multinationality, R&D and productivity: Evidence from the top R&D investors worldwide. International Business Review, 26(3), 405-416.
Chachuli, F. S. M., Mat, S., Ludin, N. A., & Sopian, K. (2021). Performance evaluation of renewable energy R&D activities in Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 163, 544-560.
Chan, L., & Daim, T. (2018). A research and development decision model for pharmaceutical industry: case of China. R&D Management, 48(2), 223-242.
Chen, C.-T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 114(1), 1-9.
Cin, B. C., Kim, Y. J., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from Korean SMEs. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 345-360.
Di Cintio, M., Ghosh, S., & Grassi, E. (2017). Firm growth, R&D expenditures and exports: An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. Research Policy, 46(4), 836-852.
Fenton, N., & Wang, W. (2006). Risk and confidence analysis for fuzzy multicriteria decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 19(6), 430-437.
Gang, J.,& Wei,Y.(2017).A Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation System Based Delphi–AHP and Its Application to R&D Planning Project Evaluation.Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management,341-351.
Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23-31.
Kang, J., Kim, J.-S.,& Seol,S.(2019).The prioritization of technologies and public R&D roles between the manufacturing and service industries in the fourth industrial revolution.foresight,21(6),680-694.
Kang, T., Baek, C., & Lee, J.-D. (2017). The persistency and volatility of the firm R&D investment: Revisited from the perspective of technological capability. Research Policy, 46(9), 1570-1579.
Khoshnevis, P., & Teirlinck, P. (2018). Performance evaluation of R&D active firms. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 16-28.
Kiraz, A., Canpolat, O., Erkan, E. F., & Albayrak, F. (2018). Evaluating R&D Projects Using Two Phases Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 49-53.
Koçak, E., Kınacı, H., & Shehzad, K. (2021). Environmental efficiency of disaggregated energy R&D expenditures in OECD: A bootstrap DEA approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(15), 19381-19390.
Kyung, J.-s. (2018). A Study on R&D Investment Decision Making Model by Using Small-Medium Enterprises Strategic Technology Roadmap. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 19(12), 786-794.
Lampert, C. M., & Kim, M. (2019). Going far to go further: Offshoring, exploration, and R&D performance. Journal of Business Research, 103, 376-386.
Li, D.-F., Wang, Y.-C., Liu, S., & Shan, F. (2009). Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision-making using IFS. Applied soft computing, 9(1), 219-225.
Liao, M.-S., Liang, G.-S., & Chen, C.-Y. (2013). Fuzzy grey relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Quality & Quantity, 47(6), 3065-3077.
Lukach, R., Kort, P. M., & Plasmans, J. (2007). Optimal R&D investment strategies under the threat of new technology entry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(1), 103-119.
Mahdieh, O., Pirayesh, R., & Baboli, M. (2022). The Effect of Switching Cost on Customers Loyalty and Likelihood of Churn. Consumer Behavior Studies Journal, 8(4), 46-61. (In Persian)
Penan, H. (1996). R & D strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer's disease therapeutic strategies. Research Policy, 25(3), 337-358.
Pennetier, C., Girotra, K., & Mihm, J. (2019). R&D Spending: Dynamic or Persistent? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(3), 636-657.
Pisano, G. (2012). Creating an R&D Strategy, Harvard Business School. Retrieved from
Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57.
Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.
Ruiqi, W., Wang, F., Xu, L., & Yuan, C. (2017). R&D expenditures, ultimate ownership and future performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 71, 47-54.
Rezvani, M., Sadat Asadi, N., & Rezaee, M. (2022). Designing Diversified Sales Strategy by Using Database Marketing (CaseStudy: Insurance Company Active in Free Trade Zones). Consumer Behavior Studies Journal, 8(4), 21-45. (In Persian)
Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Evaluation and program planning, 66, 147-155.
Simao, L., & Franco, M. (2020). Understanding the influence of R&D collaboration on organizational innovation: Empirical evidences Disruptive Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1983-2005): IGI Global.
Sinimole, K., & Saini, K. M. (2020). Performance evaluation of R&D organisations: an Asian perspective. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1-19.
Soltanzadeh, J., Elyasi, M., Ghaderifar, E., Rezaei Soufi, H., & Khoshsirat, M. (2020). Evaluation of the effect of R&D subsidies on Iranian firms’ innovative behavior. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 11(1), 17-48. (In Persian)
Song, C. H. (2019). Deriving and Assessing Strategic Priorities for Outsourcing Partner Selection in Pharmaceutical R&D: an Approach Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Based on 34 Experts’ Responses From Korean Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 14(1), 66-75.
Steinberg, P. J., Procher, V. D., & Urbig, D. (2017). Too much or too little of R&D offshoring: The impact of captive offshoring and contract offshoring on innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(10), 1810-1823.
Tian, Z.-p., Wang, J.-q., & Zhang, H.-y.  (2018). An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods. Applied Soft Computing, 72, 636-646.
Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Vincent, F. Y., & Hu, K.-J. (2010). An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the performance evaluation of multiple manufacturing plants.Computers & Industrial Engineering,58(2),269-277.
Wei, G.-W. (2010). GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 243-247.
Yalcin, A. S., Kilic, H. S., & Guler, E. (2019). Research and Development Project Selection via IF-DEMATEL and IF-TOPSIS. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Information and control. Fuzzy sets, 8(3), 338-353.
Zhang, H., Ding, D., & Ke, L. (2019). The effect of R&D input and financial agglomeration on the growth private enterprises: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industry. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(10), 2298-2313.
Zhang, S.-f., Liu, S.-y., & Zhai, R.-h. (2011). An extended GRA method for MCDM with interval-valued triangular fuzzy assessments and unknown weights. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(4), 1336-1341.
Zhao, H., & Guo, S. (2014). Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid MCDM method for sustainability. Sustainability, 6(1), 217-235.
 
Consumer Behavior Studies Journal
Volume 9, Issue 1
April 2022
Pages 207-229

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics