بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر ترجیح نام و نشان تجاری ازدیدگاه مصرف‌کنندگان

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه مدیریت دانشگاه اصفهان

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تکنولوژی دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازاریابی دانشگاه اصفهان

4 دانشجوی کارشناسی مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه کردستان

چکیده

در دنیای رقابتی امروزی، داشتن مزیت رقابتی امری کلیدی برای هر شرکتی است. یکی از مهم‌ترین و غیرقابل تقلیدترین دارایی‌های هر شرکتی، ارزش ویژه نام و نشان تجاری آن است. ارزیابی پیامدها و نتایج مدیریت ارزش ویژه برند یکی از مهم‌ترین موضوعات سنجش دارایی‌های نامشهودسازمان‌ها در اقتصاد نوین است. هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر ترجیح نام و نشان تجاری توسط مصرف‌کنندگان است. به این منظور سه سازه ارزش ویژه دانشی، ارزش ویژه نگرشی و ارزش ویژه ارتباطی مورد بررسی و تأثیر آن‌ها بر ترجیح نام و نشان تجاری سنجیده شده است. دو نام‌ونشان تجاری مورد بررسی در این پژوهش، هاکوپیان و ماکسیم هستند که در صنعت پوشاک ایران فعال هستند. به منظور گردآوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه‌‌ای دارای طیف پنج گزینه‌ای لیکرت میان مصرف کنندگان پوشاک در شهر تهران توزیع گردید. داده‌های گردآوری‌شده با استفاده از مدل معادلات ساختاری[1] تحلیل گردیده است. نتایج حاصله بیان می‌کند که تنها سازه ارزش ویژه ارتباطی (شامل شاخص‌های ارزش دریافتی، رضایت از نام و نشان تجاری و وفاداری نگرشی) تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر ترجیح نام و نشان تجاری دارد. همچنین تأثیر مثبت و معنادار میان ترجیح نام و نشان تجاری و تصمیم به خرید آن نیز تأیید شده است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the factors influencing brand preference: consumers' perspective

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bahram Ranjbarian 1
  • Afshin Ghasemi 2
  • Edris Mahmoodi 3
  • Syamak Rahimi 4
چکیده [English]

Today’s in the competitive world, competitive advantage is a key factor to any company. One of the most important and most non-duplication of any company assets is brand equity. Assess the consequences and outcomes of brand equity management are one of the most important issues to measure intangible assets of organizations in the new economy. This study examined factors affecting the brand preference by consumers. Three structures of knowledge equity, attitudinal equity and relationship equity investigated and their impact on brand preference is measured. Two brand examined in this study are Hakoupian and Maxim, that in the clothing industry are active in Iran. For data collection, a questionnaire with a five option’s Likert range of clothing, were distributed among consumers in Tehran. The data collected were analyzed with using structural equation modeling. The result show that only the relationship equity (Includes indicators of value received, brand satisfaction and loyalty attitude) has significant positive impact on brand preference. Also positive and significant impact between the intention to purchase and brand preferences has been confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Brand equity
  • Customer-based Brand Equity
  • Brand preferences
  • intention to purchase
  • Aaker, A.David,(1996). Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets, California Management Review, Spring.Vol.38 No.3 PP.102120.
  • AakerDA, (1991).Managing Brand Equity, The Free Press, New York.
  • Achenbaum, A. (1968), “Relevant measures of consumer attitudes”, Proceedings of the ESOMAR Congress, Opatija.
  • Agarwal MK, Rao V.(1996) An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity. Mark Lett;Vol.7 No.3 pp.237 –47.
  • Assael, H. and Day, R. (1968), “Attitudes and awareness as predictors of market share”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 8 No. 4.
  • Atilgan, Edaet al, (2005).Determinants of brand equity: A verification approach in the beverage industry in Turkey", Marketing intelligence and  planning. Vol. 23 No.3, pp.237 - 248.
  • Baldauf, A. Cravens, K. S. and Binder, G. (2003), “Performance consequences of brand equity management” evidence from organizations in the value chain.” Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp 220-236 MCB UP Limited.
  • Chaudhuri, A. and Holbrook, M.B. (2001), “The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65 No.2  pp. 81-93.
  • Cobb-Walgren KJ, Ruble CA, Donthu N.(1995). Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. J Adver.Vol.24 No.3 pp.25–41 (Fall).
  • Copland, B. (1963), “An evaluation of conceptual frameworks for measuring advertising results”, paper presented at the Advertising Research Foundation, 9th Annual Conference.
  • Erdem, T. and Swait, J. (2004), “Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 191-8.
  • Farquhar, P. H. (1989) ‘Managing Brand Equity’, Marketing Research, Vol.1 No.3  pp. 24–33 (September).
  • Ghosh, A. K., Chakraborty, G and Ghosh, D. B. (1995), “Improving brand performanceby altering consumers’ brand uncertainty”, Journal of Product and BrandManagement, 4 (5), 14-20.
  • Hoyle, Rick H. (1995), structural equation modeling: concepts,issues and applications” California SAGE”.
  • Kamakura, Wagner A. and Gary J. Russell. (1993). Measuring brand value with scanner data. Internat.J.Res.Marketing.Vol.10 No.1 pp.9-22(March).
  • Keller Lane, Kevin, (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and  Managing Customer-based Brand equity, Journal of Marketing, Jan.Vol.57 No.1 pp.1-22.
  • Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Keller, K. L., S. Sood. )2004(. The effects of product experience and branding strategies on brandevaluations. Working paper, UCLA, Anderson School of Management.
  • Kim, H. & Kim, W.G. )2005(. The relationshipbetween brand equity and organizations’performance in luxury hotels and chainrestaurants. Tourism Management, 26:549–560.
  • Kim, H. and W.G. Kim, (2004). Measuring customer based restaurant brand equity-Investigating the relationship between brand equity and firm’s performance. Cornell Hotel Rest. A.Vol.45 No.2 pp.115-131.
  • Kotler, P., )2003(. Marketing Management, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ISBN 0-13-0497150.
  • Kumar, S., &Blomqvist, K. Hansted (2004). Mergers and acquisitions: Making brandequity a key factor in M&A decision-making. Strategy & Leadership, 32(2), 20−27.
  • Lassar W, Mittal B, Sharma A.(1995). Measuring customer-based brand equity. J Consum Mark Vol.12 No.4 pp.11 –9.
  • Lavidge, R.J. (1961), “A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25 No.6, pp. 59-62.
  • Mackay, M.M. (2001), “Evaluation of brand equity measures: further empirical results”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 38-51.
  • Mishra,pallabi; Data, biplab”(2011). Perpetual Asset Management of Customer-Based Brand Equity-The PAM Evaluator”,  journal of social sciences 3(1).34-43.
  • Moradi, hadi; zarei,azim, (2011). “The Impact of Brand Equity on Purchase Intention and Brand Preference-the Moderating Effects of Country of Origin Image”;Australian  journal of  basic and applied sciences; 5(3); 539-545.
  • Morgan, R.P. (2000), “A consumer-oriented framework of brand equity and loyalty”,International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 65-78.
  • Myers, C. (2003), “Managing brand equity: a look: a look at the impact of attributes” Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol.12, No.1, pp.39-51.
  • Netemeyer; richard G; Krishnan, balaji; Pulling,chris, Wang, guanping; Yagci,Mehmet; Dean, dwane; Ricks,joe; Wirth,Ferdinand; (2004). “Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity”, journal of business research. vol57, 209-224.
  • Pappu, Ravi,(2005). Consumer-based Brand equity: improving  the measurement– empirical evidence", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 14 No.3 pp.143 – 154.
  • Park CS, Srinivasan V.(1994). A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. J Mark Res.Vol.31 No.2 pp.271– 88 (May).
  • Percy, L., and Rossiter, J. (1992). A Model of Brand Awareness and Brand Attitude Advertising Strategies. Psychology & Marketing, Vol.9 No. 4 pp.263-274 (July/August).
  • Poczter, A. (1987). Attitude Development Hierarchy and Segmentation. Review of Business, Vol.9 No.1 (Summer):17-20.
  • Swait, J., Erdem, T., Louviere, J. and Dubelaar, C. (1993), “The equalization price: a measure of consumer-perceived brand equity”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 23-45.
  • Tolba, A.H. and S.S. Hassan, (2009). Linking Customer based brand equity with brand market performance:A managerial approach. J. Prod. Brand Manage.Vol.18  No.5  pp.356-366.
  • Tolba, Ahmad.H., (2011). The Impact Of Distribution Intensity On Brand Preference and Brand Loyalty, International Journal Of  Marketing, Vol.3 No. 3 pp. 56-66.
  • Vakratsas, D. and Ambler, T. (1999), “How advertising works: what do we really know?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63 No.1, pp. 26-43.
  • Washburn, J.H. and Plank, R.E. (2002), “Measuring brand equity: an evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 46-62.
  • Yasin, N., M. Nasser Noor, & O. Mohamad, 2007, Does image of country-of-origin matter to brand equity.Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16(1): 38-48.
  • Yoo, B. and Donthu, N. (1997), “Developing and validating a consumer-based overall brand equity scale for Americans and Koreans: an extension of Aaker’s and Keller’s conceptualizations”,Proceedings, AMA Summer Educator’s Conference, Chicago.
  • Yoo, B., N. Donthu, S. Lee. )2000(. An examination of selected marketing mix elements andbrand equity. J. Acad. of Marketing Science 28(2) 195-211.
  • hooman.haidar Ali 1384. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL software applications .first   edition.Tehran.samt publication(persian).